Follow-up Comment #11, task #16088 (project administration): > Thank you, approving.
Thanks a lot! > To avoid confusion in gfdl-tex.tex, I recommend > considering a way to include fdl-1.3.tex from > http://www.gnu.org directly. I have seen that file, but I didn't like its indentation, so I used this one, I hope that's not a serious problem. > I don't think I understand the question. "Safeness" can't be > abstract, it implies a threat model, and I see no obvious > threat model. Maybe I used a wrong word or didn't provide enough context. It simply meant whether the URLs I mentioned will work or they are wrong. I was assuming their structure by looking at the URLs of other projects, so I asked if I am guessing the structure correctly or not, never mind, I received an e-mail from Savannah which had the URL similar to mine, so I think I have guessed it correctly. Thanks. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16088> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.nongnu.org/
