On 11/15/2011 08:53 PM, Stef wrote:
> Le mardi 15 novembre 2011 10:01:23 Jiri Slaby a ?crit :
>> On 11/15/2011 05:24 AM, Stef wrote:
>>> thanks for the debug data. I'll compare it with how my LiDE 110 is
>>>
>>> behaving. Are you running a 64 bit system ?
>>
>> Hi, yes, but 32bit (in a VM) is the same. If you want any other output,
>> don't hesitate to ask...
>>
>> thanks,
>
> Hello,
>
> I have generated the same log with my LiDE 110 and I am comparing both
> in
> search of a clue. I have already noticed that your version is built with
> libusb while mine is using libusb_1. I would be nice if you could find some
> time to try a version built with it. I already know that libusb causes me
> some
> trouble (ie scanner not working at all).
Hi, with this:
./configure --without-snmp BACKENDS=genesys --prefix=/usr
--sysconfdir=/etc --enable-libusb_1_0
it is the very same... (Except the libs are not linked against the old
lib of course.)
$ ldd ddd/usr//lib64/sane//libsane-genesys.so.1
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffbefff000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fbbfdceb000)
libusb-1.0.so.0 => /lib64/libusb-1.0.so.0 (0x00007fbbfdadc000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fbbfd74d000)
librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00007fbbfd545000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fbbfd327000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fbbfe1d4000)
thanks,
--
js
