On Tuesday 15 November 2011 20:53:17 Stef wrote: > Le mardi 15 novembre 2011 10:01:23 Jiri Slaby a ?crit : > > On 11/15/2011 05:24 AM, Stef wrote: > > > thanks for the debug data. I'll compare it with how my LiDE 110 is > > > > > > behaving. Are you running a 64 bit system ? > > > > Hi, yes, but 32bit (in a VM) is the same. If you want any other output, > > don't hesitate to ask... > > > > thanks, > > Hello, > > I have generated the same log with my LiDE 110 and I am comparing both > in > search of a clue. I have already noticed that your version is built with > libusb while mine is using libusb_1. I would be nice if you could find some > time to try a version built with it. I already know that libusb causes me > some trouble (ie scanner not working at all).
FWIW, I have sane-1.0.22 built with libusb_1 and my LiDE 210 works like a charm. Grs, Heinz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20111115/9f2ec53e/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 230 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20111115/9f2ec53e/attachment-0001.pgp>
