On Friday, May 8, 2020 at 3:03:46 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Friday, May 8, 2020 at 2:17:25 PM UTC-7, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> >> There are some duplicates in there (I've wasted enough time on it), but >> it matches things that a regex never will. That function is implemented >> by the following code, which belongs in a third-party library and not >> sage itself because it has nothing to do with mathematics: >> >> There are already lots of things in the Sage library that have to do with > the Sage library rather than mathematics, like "import_statements" (in > sage.misc.dev_tools) or sage.misc.superseded or sage.features.* or > sage.doctest.*. Maybe they should all be separated into their own > libraries, I don't know. In any case, let's not automatically discard new > ideas because they have nothing to do with mathematics. > > I have created https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29670 (Meta-ticket: Review of development tools in Sage vs. mainstream Python tools) to help convert this lively thread to action items.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/515f35e6-a1e6-4da9-8172-a315edd74485%40googlegroups.com.
