On Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 4:40:52 AM UTC-7, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 5/6/20 11:28 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > And to clarify, this is what you expect users to use instead of > > search_src? ;) > > >
And to clarify, neither you nor Dima understand ";)"? > It's an improvement to sage-grep. In another message you said, "It was > reimplemented in Python to make it work across platforms... and to make > it faster." It's not a fair comparison if you don't write the find-grep > command in a portable/efficient way. The one I gave is portable (the > trailing "+" was added to POSIX around Y2K) and as fast as possible. > > A script that we ship to end users has to be portable, which is why that > command is a mouthful even though most of that syntax has been in "man > find" forever. But individual users only need something that works on > their machines. So POSIX trivia aside, "do whatever you would normally > do to search a bunch of files for a string" is still the best answer, > and will be far simpler than a command that needs to work on last week's > Fedora and last decade's Solaris. In real life, I would "grep -irl" the > whole directory, because that's what I normally do and is easy for me. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/10d01ea7-22eb-4ca3-93a4-65adcc47addb%40googlegroups.com.