On Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 9:58:55 AM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 4:40:52 AM UTC-7, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>
>> On 5/6/20 11:28 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: 
>> > 
>> > And to clarify, this is what you expect users to use instead of 
>> > search_src?  ;) 
>> > 
>>
>
> And to clarify, neither you nor Dima understand ";)"?
>
>
>
>> It's an improvement to sage-grep. In another message you said, "It was 
>> reimplemented in Python to make it work across platforms... and to make 
>> it faster." It's not a fair comparison if you don't write the find-grep 
>> command in a portable/efficient way. The one I gave is portable (the 
>> trailing "+" was added to POSIX around Y2K) and as fast as possible. 
>>
>> A script that we ship to end users has to be portable, which is why that 
>> command is a mouthful even though most of that syntax has been in "man 
>> find" forever. But individual users only need something that works on 
>> their machines. So POSIX trivia aside, "do whatever you would normally 
>> do to search a bunch of files for a string" is still the best answer, 
>> and will be far simpler than a command that needs to work on last week's 
>> Fedora and last decade's Solaris. In real life, I would "grep -irl" the 
>> whole directory, because that's what I normally do and is easy for me. 
>>
>
And in real life, I tend to use "git grep ..." so I can easily ignore large 
parts of the directory.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/454f4def-9286-40c1-b3b1-c8a849d750f3%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to