On Wednesday, 30 September 2015 13:06:45 UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2015-09-30 21:11, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 11:51:35 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer > wrote: > > > > On 2015-09-30 20:46, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > after all it's probably publishable work > > Unfortunately, I very much doubt that this is true. Developing > > algorithms on paper is publishable, actually implementing them > usually > > isn't. > > > > there are many areas where benchmarks are a must. That is, one needs > some > > kind of implementation, preferably a fast one. > > "some kind of implementation" is very different from an implementation > which is user friendly, portable, easy to compile & install, bug-free,... >
come, come. Implementing something mathematically non-trivial on a GPU for the 1st time is still publishable research, although not in mathematics, but somewhere in between mathematics and CS. See e.g. Communications of ACM to see highlights of this sort of research. And most people who do good implementations appreciate the maintainability of code they write. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
