On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 11:34:06 AM UTC-7, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> I don't disagree. But none of that is realistic.
>
> I think $100k annual is more realistically the market rate. But then you 
> get to be pushed around every day, have 9-5 working hours and deadlines. 
> I've turned down offers to interview for such positions because I prefer 
> the flexibility of academic work.
>
> There's no chance of tenure at any academic institution if you are 
> employed as a software engineer. So that's unrealistic.
>

I was a research programmer for a year at Utrecht University (on CGAL); 
IMHO 
it didn't hurt my tenure prospects (not that I have a tenure now, but I'm 
still around in academia :-))
And it was with 9-5 (and more) working hours and deadlines, and I was 
pushed around quite a bit.


> And we are a mathematics dept. So hiring someone as a mathematics postdoc 
> isn't going to get this job done. 
>

No, why? Are you serious? Are you yourself a tenured professor now?


> I do accept the premise that higher compensation might feasibly attract 
> applicants. It's not possible though. It looks to me like the position may 
> go unfilled.
>

you have to re-package it as a postdoc; after all it's probably publishable 
work, to get something working the way you want...

Or/and offer part-time and/or remore work. 

Dima


> Bill.
>
> On Wednesday, 30 September 2015 20:23:46 UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 4:55:29 PM UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote:
>>>
>>> We have the money. We know what needs to be done. But we have zero 
>>> applicants. There is a lack of talent, not a lack of money in some areas.
>>>
>>
>> You are looking for an expert in compilers / optimization who happens to 
>> have a math graduate degree. Those obviously exist, the problem is that 
>> that this is a valuable skillset. I'm guessing to the tune of $200k annual 
>> if you work for one of the tech giants. Since you can't pay with stock 
>> options that means either
>>
>> a) offer market rate (and 200k for one year only is less attractive than 
>> 200k every year)
>>
>> b) offer flexibility (remote work etc.)
>>
>> c) offer a chance at tenure (long postdoc, prestigious institution, 
>> famous adviser)
>>
>> Its basic economics: If you didn't get any applications then your 
>> compensation is inadequate.
>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to