Am Mittwoch, 10. September 2014 19:54:06 UTC+2 schrieb Nils Bruin: > > On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 10:38:50 AM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote: >> >> sage: Permutation([0,1,2]) >> > > aw shoot. The problem is there already, because we're defining > permutations by *ordered list of images* rather than as a composition of > cycles. That means the base actually is important right from the start. > Can't we just define permutations as a composition of cycles instead? Then > we indeed do not have to worry about whether they're 0 or 1 based. >
I think that's what PermutationGroup and PermutationGroupElement do. Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
