Yooooooooooo !
> Well, there are two ways to make this consistent:
>
> 1) it being deprecated and removed, eventually.
> i.e. things like Permutation((3,5,7))
> must become Permutation(['(3,5,7)'])
>
> 2) things like Permutation((3,5,7),(1,2),(42,41))
> should be allowed as well.
>
> I'd much prefer 2). Should we hold a formal vote?
2) would make it less inconsistent but then we still have the problem that
Permutation([1,2,3]) != Permutation((1,2,3)). So given that:
Permutation([(3,5,7),(1,2),(42,41)])
already works I do not find it is very bad if
Permutation((3,5,7),(1,2),(42,41))
does not. So I vote for 1).
I would also be very happy if 1-based permutations were not at the same
time 0-based words, i.e.:
sage: Permutation([3,2,1])(1)
3
sage: Permutation([3,2,1])[1]
2
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
