Hello ! > and the > combinatorial object Permutation which should stay 1-based.
I disagree. > And yes Nathan, everyone agrees there are some lack of consistency and the > one you mention about bruhat_inversions and inversions is definitely one. It is not what I say. What I say is that 1-based permutations are so uncompatible with Python's standard that we will never be at peace until we have 0-based permutations instead. And I take this function as evidence. > But still, the solution is not to remove 1-based permutation. Maybe I could > be more clear, if 1-based permutations were removed, I would have to use an > old version of Sage so that I can properly work, or fork it, or re-introduce > them. I NEED THEM FOR MY RESEARCH, can you understand that? And I'm > definitely not the only one. It makes me weep when I think of all those mathematicians who stopped using computers because arrays are 0-indexed. Sorry, but I call that bluff. Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
