> yes, that's a good idea. > I also would prefer having Permutation0 and Permutation1 classes, > and Permutation=Permutation1 by default > (so that you can just say Permutation=Permutation0 right at the > beginning of your code, and proceed as you like).
I believe that having two kinds of permutations that do not work together is even worse than having 1-based permutations. Plus I am dead scared of what it may mean to either 1) Change the current code to handle 0-based AND 1-based permutations; or 2) Have two versions of each function The only good side that I see is that having those two kind of permutations will be so awful that we will shortly drop one, preferably the 1-based permutations. Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
