Le vendredi 16 mars, Keshav Kini a écrit: > "R. Andrew Ohana" <andrew.oh...@gmail.com> writes: > > This makes it obvious that I'm against having later versions of sage > > be based upon previous versions, however, I am completely for later > > versions of sage having all of the commits of earlier versions of > > sage (as well as all relative order maintained). > > Just to be clear to anyone reading, I am ambivalent toward the former, > and the latter is what I meant in the title of this thread.
If a later version contains everything gone in a previous version... then how is it not based on it? I'm lost... Snark -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
