> > I think something as simple as sorting the "tickets needing review" by > > author karma would be useful without being overly complicated or formal. The > > Yes, that's exactly what I was thinking of. If somebody referees a > lot of patches, then they automatically get singled out as "somebody > whose code contributions are extra deserving of reviews". >
This seems reasonable, especially if it stays relatively unobtrusive. It would be bad to punish those who contribute great patches but only have time to contribute, not necessarily review, and could motivate reviewers who don't or can't often contribute to critical fixes but would like their work added to the base. In the end, though, one would have to see how it worked. If this ordering trumped the current "urgency" ordering and then things that were urgent didn't get reviewed, that would be bad, too. > >> cannot earn review points and cannot get his code in. On the other > >> hand, others collect a lot of review points but do not code. So, there > >> must be a way to trade points... !? Everything is fungible, you mean... maybe we could trade them for WoW money. Or maybe it could be Sage points, like AMS points, and you could use them to get a free copy of Sage. - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
