On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:52 AM, Harald Schilly wrote:
On Apr 14, 6:23 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kir...@onetel.net>
wrote:
That could backfire - people may decide to review tickets they
might not
otherwise feel confident about reviewing.
That's a good point. Fortunately, all the people I've met in the Sage
community only want to let good code it, and hopefully it isn't rigid
enough to provide motivation to cheat the system.
You are right, that could be a problem and it's also a "closed game".
If there are no new tickets with unreviewed code,
Wow, that'll be a nice day :)
a new developer
cannot earn review points and cannot get his code in. On the other
hand, others collect a lot of review points but do not code. So, there
must be a way to trade points... !?
I think something as simple as sorting the "tickets needing review" by
author karma would be useful without being overly complicated or
formal. The top karma earner per release could also be announced as
part of the release notes.
- Robert
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
