> > Does this mean [x==r1] when called for the first time, [x==r2] when > > for the secod time and so on?
Probably. Alternately, we could change our use of to_poly_solver in solve() to use the sane_variables option or whatever it is, which always makes the variables nice like that. > > Do not know where to find the next free variable. I will patch in such > a way that it returns [x==r1] in all cases and > ([x=r1],[]) for multiplicities:True. > O.K.? You may want to see how to_poly_solver in Maxima handles this creation. You can email Barton Willis (its creator) for details. > > Is nowhttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7491 (I was not able > to find related ticket, perhaps never reported) Don't think it was. - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
