ma...@mendelu.cz wrote: > On 18 lis, 21:49, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I got this from the "report a problem" form, confirmed in 4.2.1 >> >> sage: solve([x==x],x) >> gives an exception. >> >> Maxima says this: >> $ maxima -q >> (%i1) solve([x=x],x); >> (%o1) all >> (%i2) > > Similar problem is > solve(SR(0),x) > > and another problem is > solve(0,x) > - but both these cases are highly improbable. Should be the second one > fixed or no? > > I think that it is easy to catch the answer 'all' in the maxima output > and change into anything we want on output, but the question is, what > should be the output of solve([x==x],x) and solve([x==x],x, > solution_dict=True) in Sage >
[x==r1] would be consistent with the multivariable case; I like that better than True or [x==x], for example. Jason -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
