On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Robert
Bradshaw<rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2009, at 1:19 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> Personally, I prefer the Mathematica notation because I can actually
>> read it. I have (serious!) trouble reading the current notation that
>> Sage uses and I can barely read the Maple notation either. With the
>> Mathematica notation it is totally completely obvious to me what is
>> going on.
>
> If it wasn't obvious from my previous comments in former threads, I
> am of this opinion as well. I would actually be for disallowing the
> bare function('f') from the global namespace altogether and forcing
> the user to provide named, ordered dummy variables (what does it
> actually mean?)
I'm not opposed to that suggestion. I have no idea what
"function('f')" even means.
William
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
