Hi Golam,
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:58:19 -0300
Golam Mortuza Hossain <gmhoss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Burcin Erocal<bur...@erocal.org>
> wrote:
> > If there are no objections to the above definition of "hybrid
> > approach", the options for default printing are:
> >
> > 1) Mathematica style
> > 2) Maple style
> > 3) hybrid
> >
> > I still vote for 1, MMA style. To state the reasons again, it's
> > consistent, and concise.
>
> Burcin, I am giving you my vote also, for implementing MMA
> style typesetting as the default one for partial derivatives. Please
> have those {'} and {''} and may be even {'''} notations.
>
> So I would urge you to go ahead with the implementation.
:) I was hoping you'd implement it, since you did it in #5711 once.
I attached a patch to the trac ticket that contains an initial attempt
at the MMA notation:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6344
It doesn't work well for text mode:
sage: f = function('f')
sage: f(x).derivative(x,3)
f^{(3)}(x)
Comments, suggestions and patches are welcome.
Thanks.
Burcin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
