On Jan 25, 2009, at 9:00 AM, William Stein wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 8:44 AM, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com>  
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 25, 8:20 am, Martin Albrecht <m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
>> wrote:
>>>> 4.0 was discussed
>>>
>>> I think we should agree way in advance when 4.0 is going to be
>>
>> +1
>>
>>>  and then allow
>>> ourselves to break backwards compatibility: i.e. go through and  
>>> remove a
>>> bunch of cruft (at least the stuff that has a DeprecationWarning).
>> I don't think it is a good idea at all. Deprecation warnings are the
>> way to go and I think even six months is too little time to give the
>
> I also think the above suggestion about 4.0 by Martin is not so good.
> We already hashed out a deprecation policy, which is a gradual  
> timed (usually
> 6-month) phasing out of functionality with DeprecationsWarning's.   
> I think it
> works well, and that we should stick to it.

I think DeprecationsWarnings are the way to go too, but Martin has a  
point that when we do actually drop support it shouldn't be on some  
tiny point release.

> For a long time (since 3.0) the main goals of 4.0 have been:
>     * massive improvement in doctest coverage
>     * Solaris port
>     * 64-bit OS X port
>     * Windows port
>
> At this point the windows port ended up getting little direct work
> done on it, so that is off the table for 4.0.  Everything else above
> is.  To make it  more precise, here's what 4.0 should be:
>     * get doctest coverage to 70%
>     * tier 1 support for 32-bit Solaris
>     * tier 1 support for 64-bit OS X
>
> I would like to see this all happen by the end of the first quarter  
> 2009.

I saw there was discussion of the Windows port at SD12. It doesn't  
look like the wiki page has been updated, is there a good summary of  
what the status is?

- Robert



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to