On Dec 29, 2008, at 7:36 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> > > That's awesome. I'm really glad you did / are doing this. It's by > far one of the most important steps in actually doing what I'm asking > about. I think the time to make such a test suite should be > considered in evaluating how feasible what I'm suggesting is. I should be finished my contract by the 12th and then I hope to get back to the test suite. However, even the ones I've "completed" have some difficulty because of multiple solutions. I need to figure out a way of properly representing them. Plus, I'd like to see if there is a way to use the Python unit testing facilities, but it doesn't seem like there is an easy way to include timing the unit tests. >> > I'm very glad you're willing to work on this. That means there are > now at least 3 people very seriously interested in working on this. > (me, you, Burcin). > That's great. I'm curious as to the how the improved Maxima integration fares as to the current version in Sage. Maxima overall seems like the best choice to look at for porting if that's the approach we want to take. Although, some of the Sympy integrals were quite fast for some of the ones I could test. Cheers, Tim. --- Tim Lahey PhD Candidate, Systems Design Engineering University of Waterloo http://www.linkedin.com/in/timlahey --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
