basically, +1 On Dec 29, 10:28 pm, Burcin Erocal <bur...@erocal.org> wrote: > It would be good to start a wiki page to make a list of what needs to > be replaced/rewritten to be able to drop the maxima dependency without > losing functionality. >
good idea, there could also be a separate trac milestone for all the tickets. I think, one major point is integration. It should be made sure, that all common textbook integrals work and there are test suits for them. Maybe, there is enough momentum behind sympy (or something else?) to create new implementations of algorithms. The other major point is solving equations - to solve systems and present complicated solutions as a set of cases and not the maxima questions. Definitely interesting to see how far this could work out... Probably, the first important step is a quick exchange of data between sage (pynac) and sympy. I don't think a fixed timetable would work out, this transition should happen step by step (hence the separate milstone) as the functionalities are replaced and probably the best idea is to just follow the general direction to make lisp/maxima optional. [<- at least, this last part is something concrete we should agree on or not :) ] H --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
