On Sep 24, 4:37 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John, > About reviews: we put in place a system of editors. Does every > ticket have an editor, who is informed when there are patches to be > reviewed, so that he/she can ask suitable people to do the reviewing? > It does not seem quite right to me for patch authors to solicit > reviews themselves -- though of course I do that and so does everyone > else and we all trust each other :). I think it would be better if > editors took more control of the process. (But then, I am not an > editor.) The editor thing worked out great while people were all in the same place, but so far online it has not worked very well. We are down numerically regarding the tickets without review and I agree that authors (especially if they have been around a while and know the right people to ping) should solicit reviews. We certainly need more reviews, but overall the balance is being maintained. Either way: If anyone can come up with a better system please let us know. I guess in the end something like a regular meeting of a small number of editors could work even online, so let's give it another try. > John Cheers, Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
