John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What about tth? I've had pretty good luck with that, and when it > works, it produces better-looking math than latex2html.
http://hutchinson.belmont.ma.us/tth/ tth has the advantage that it doesn't use images. I use tth to produce the web versions of the abstracts for Homology, Homotopy and Applications, but I almost always have to edit the output. One reason is that it uses the symbol font, and with every version of firefox I've tried this doesn't produce the right output. The other reason is that tth doesn't understand many complicated constructs. Another issue with tth is that it is commercial software. So while it's useful to me as a basis for hand-edited html, I don't think it is useful for large documents that should be viewable without any special configuration. If you want to see some amazing output, check out the n-category cafe. It's all done using MathML (no images), so you need to have the right fonts installed, but the result is amazing. See, for example: http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/05/electricmagbeticduality_and_ho.html and the itex test suite: http://xbeta.org/wiki/show/itex itex is not meant to process ordinary tex documents, so I don't think it's a solution for the SAGE reference manual, but the output shows what a *good* tex to html converter could be able to achieve. More about itex: http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/itex2MMLcommands.html Dan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
