On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 at 07:58PM -0700, William Stein wrote: >> The sage documentation is just too complicated for latex2html at this >> point. latex2html has a screwy non-gpl compatible license. We really >> need to find some way forward, and latex2html maybe isn't it. Perhaps >> something like sphinx is. > > There's plasTeX: http://plastex.sourceforge.net/ > > "plasTeX is a LaTeX document processing framework written entirely in > Python. It currently comes bundled with an XHTML renderer (including > multiple themes), as well as a way to simply dump the document to a > generic form of XML. Other renderers can be added as well and are > planned for future releases." > > I glanced over the license(s), and it seems basically GPL-compatible. > > Dan
I tried plasTex on 3-4 separate occasions. I so wish it actually worked. It only works on trivial examples, and falls apart on anything nontrivial at all, in all my experience. latex2html is vastly more robust than that. I wish this weren't the case. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
