On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 8:37 PM Oscar Benjamin
<oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 at 20:19, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Mind you, Mathematica (!) bundles Flint (which is GPL, and depends on
> > GPLd libraries).
>
> FLINT is LGPL as are its dependencies GMP and MPFR.
>
> I'm no expert on license terms but Wikipedia says:
>
> The main difference between the GPL and the LGPL is that the latter
> allows the work to be linked with (in the case of a library, "used
> by") a non-(L)GPLed program, regardless of whether it is licensed
> under a license of GPL family or other licenses.
>
> That suggests that LGPL rather than GPL is needed for Mathematica to
> bundle FLINT in the way that it does.

Indeed, Flint is dual licensed under GPL and LGPL - so why don't we
re-license sagelib under LGPL then. E.g. that's how gmpy2 is licensed:

sage: gmpy2.license()
'The GMPY2 source code is licensed under LGPL 3 or later. The
supported versions of the GMP, MPFR, and MPC libraries are also
licensed under LGPL 3 or later.'

I don't know whether it'd need a lot of individual approvals, but
GPL->LGPL is certainly done quite often. E.g. GMP was relicenced under
LGPL from version 6 on.

Dima

>
> --
> Oscar
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAHVvXxSqfrUkMSwOwg7zmfFUtDPFh34G7neiZHgbAEZ0_ibghw%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq1QewV981iF6Sf_XuGmyrJWXwAsqSDjkU%3DJ2s6CQuxqAg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to