On Jan 16, 2008, at 11:51 AM, David Roe wrote: > Of course, it'd be nice if every function had ample documentation, > but I'd rather have 100% coverage on all user-accessible functions in > two files, than 100% coverage in one file for def/cpdef and cdef > functions. Also, often the "inderect" tests for cdef functions seem > to be redundant with the doctests exposed functions. > > The indirect doctests are sometimes reduntant. But sometimes they > are things like _add_c_impl, which won't necessarily get doctested > elsewhere.
I'm not advocating that no cdef functions should have doctests, certainly things like _add_c_impl should. - Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
