With the modifications, our overall coverage is at 33.1%. David On Jan 16, 2008 2:56 PM, mabshoff < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Jan 16, 8:51 pm, "David Roe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Of course, it'd be nice if every function had ample documentation, > > > but I'd rather have 100% coverage on all user-accessible functions in > > > two files, than 100% coverage in one file for def/cpdef and cdef > > > functions. Also, often the "inderect" tests for cdef functions seem > > > to be redundant with the doctests exposed functions. > > > > The indirect doctests are sometimes reduntant. But sometimes they are > > things like _add_c_impl, which won't necessarily get doctested > elsewhere. > > David > > I think it can't hurt to test those. When I need to debug some odd > crash on an experimental platforms with very abstract, high level code > it would greatly help to narrow down the issue if those functions > would also be doctested and exposed when I run -testall on the build. > While it certainly is a lot of effort it would still be worth it. The > only negative impact I would see is that our percentage of - > coverageall would probably do drop quite a bit. > > Cheers, > > Michael > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
