Sounds like a good idea--I'll be able to participate in the morning at least. Do we want to require all cdef functions to have doctests? Also, how to test them?
- Robert On Jan 16, 2008, at 11:09 AM, David Roe wrote: > Note that I just put up a ticket with patch (1795) that fixes sage- > coverage so that it checks cdef'd and cpdef'd functions and classes. > David > > On Jan 16, 2008 12:00 PM, Martin Albrecht < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > bremen.de> wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 January 2008, mabshoff wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > after doing 8 Bug Days the time has come to spend some more time on > > the documentation, which also needs a lot of work. So after some > > discussion in IRC we decided to get together in IRC at the above > date > > and time and work on the documentation. Since we have never done > a doc > > day it isn't 100% clear to me how the whole thing will go down, > but I > > assume we will just go with the flow. > > > > Thoughts? Suggestions? > > Suggestion: each participant goes through a file of his/her own > choice and > makes sure it has 100% doctest coverage. Reading the source of the > possibly > unfamiliar file is also encouraged. > > Martin > > > -- > name: Martin Albrecht > _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 > _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb > _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
