On Jan 16, 8:32 pm, "David Roe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My modification to sage-coverage checks to see that doctests are present in
> the docstring of a cdef'd function but doesn't check that the function name
> is there (because it usually won't be).
> David
Nice. Robert, can you review that ticket, too? I would like to merge
it for alpha4 which should be the basis for the Doc Day IMHO.
On a side note: I was under the impression that we would also work on
documentation, while everybody else is talking about doctests ;).
Cheers,
Michael
> On Jan 16, 2008 2:24 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 16-Jan-08, at 11:17 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> > > Sounds like a good idea--I'll be able to participate in the morning
> > > at least. Do we want to require all cdef functions to have doctests?
> > > Also, how to test them?
>
> > I vote to require. Presumably all cdef functions are exercised by
> > some part of the python accessible code (otherwise, why are they
> > present?). Doctests in cdef docstrings are found by the doctesting
> > architecture and executed. So they will be tested, just not in the
> > most straightforward way :)
>
> > Nick
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
