On Dec 20, 2007 12:23 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> So, I would summarize Robert and Jason's discussion as agreeing > >> that the bug > >> is invalid? > > > > Yes. > > If this bug is marked invalid, I think we ought to have huge warning > signs somewhere. I think the bug has a good point about the current > behavior being confusing to a new user. I do like the convenience the > current approach affords.
This bug is now marked invalid. Where would the huge warning sign be? Perhaps in the output of sage: latex? In fact, latex? doesn't print *anything* right now at all, so somebody writing some documentation and docstrings there would be good! We really need to have a "doc day". -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
