Fernando wrote: > I certainly wasn't trying to dissuade Ted from 'scratching his itch', > I hope it didn't come across that way. Rather my suggestion was for > what *I* see as possibly better tools to scratch said itch. I > actually happen to *really* like Ted's idea of a local client that is > a partner to the browser-based notebook, since I think there's a good > role for both.
You didn't come across that way :-) Per your suggestion, I looked at Enthought and it is very compelling. I did not know it existed before you mentioned it and I look forward to experimenting with it. One reason that I am currently working with JEdit/SAGEIDE is that I am interested in plugging SAGE into Wonderland (https://wonderland.dev.java.net/) and the code I develop for JEdit/SAGEIDE can be directly used for this. As part of this process, I am interested in helping to figure out a good protocol that can be used by any non-browser clients to communicate with SAGE. I currently have SAGEIDE communicating with SAGE using pickeled python objects and I have the Calculator applet communicating with SAGE using JSON. Between the two approaches, I am liking the JSON approach better because it is very language-neutral. What kind of communications protocol do you see being used between SAGE and Enthought? Ted --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
