On Dec 3, 2007 5:53 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I view java3d as being for the browser-based interface to Sage.
And I agree that it's the best way to do obtain in-browser 3d, but I thought Ted was interested in a local client that is Java-based. That's where I'd say that piggybacking on Enthought's work would be a far better fit for Sage than building something local in Java. Perhaps my remarks weren't clear, or I misunderstood Ted's intent. cheers, ff --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---