On Dec 3, 2007 5:53 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I view java3d as being for the browser-based interface to Sage.

And I agree that it's the best way to do obtain in-browser 3d, but I
thought Ted was interested in a local client that is Java-based.
That's where I'd say that piggybacking on Enthought's work would be a
far better fit for Sage than building something local in Java.
Perhaps my remarks weren't clear, or I misunderstood Ted's intent.

cheers,

ff

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to