On Dec 10, 10:09 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 9:55 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> dortmund.de> wrote:
> > On Dec 10, 6:32 pm, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:06:06 -0800 (PST)
>
> > > mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > <snip>
>
> > > > The increase in size is due to R as well as PolyBoRi. We will
> > > > work on decreasing the size of both packages. Burcin: can you
> > > > please post a bundle that applies against alpha4? I would like
> > > > to merge it during the alpha5 cycle.
>
> > Hi burcin,
>
> > > The new bundle, and a link to the new package is available at:
>
> > >http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/469#comment:11
>
> > The bundle applies cleanly and I also updated to the latest
> > polybori.spkg you linked. But when doctesting devel/sage/sage/rings/
> > polynomial/pbori.pyx it bombs out with
>
> burcin,
>
> it looks like the new dependency tracking for Cython files is at
> fault, so let's hold off until we sort that out. I just got the
> following failure after applying ondrej's patch (which touches
> coerce.pyx):
>
> Building sage/structure/coerce.c because it depends on sage/structure/
> coerce.pyx.
> cython --embed-positions --incref-local-binop -I/tmp/Work-mabshoff/
> release-cycles-2.9/sage-2.9.alpha4/devel/sage-main -o sage/structure/
> coerce.c sage/structure/coerce.pyx
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "setup.py", line 1124, in <module>
> cython(ext_modules)
> File "setup.py", line 1111, in cython
> new_sources += process_cython_file(f, m, deps_of)
> File "setup.py", line 1061, in process_cython_file
> if need_to_cython(f, outfile, deps_of):
> File "setup.py", line 1035, in need_to_cython
> if os.path.exists(pxd) and check_dependencies(pxd, outfile, deps):
> File "setup.py", line 1011, in check_dependencies
> deps = deps_of[filename]
> KeyError: 'sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pxd'
> sage: There was an error installing modified sage library code.
>
ok, William fixed that, I rebuild the tree, but neither William nor I
can find the BooleanRing anywhere.
Cheers,
Michael
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> > File "pbori.pyx", line 377:
> > sage: P.<x,y,z> = BooleanPolynomialRing(3)
> > Exception raised:
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/tmp/Work-mabshoff/release-cycles-2.9/sage-2.9.alpha4/
> > local/lib/python2.5/doctest.py", line 1212, in __run
> > compileflags, 1) in test.globs
> > File "<doctest __main__.example_11[0]>", line 1, in <module>
> > P = BooleanPolynomialRing(Integer(3),names=('x', 'y', 'z'));
> > (x, y, z,) = P._first_ngens(Integer(3))###line 377:
> > sage: P.<x,y,z> = BooleanPolynomialRing(3)
> > NameError: name 'BooleanPolynomialRing' is not defined
>
> > Consequently many of the following doctests fail since P isn't
> > defined. Any idea what to do? Mismerge? Bit and pieces missing from
> > the bundle? If you send me an update please make it a patch relative
> > to the tip of the bundle linked above.
>
> > > Cheers,
> > > Burcin
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
