On Dec 10, 6:32 pm, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:06:06 -0800 (PST)
>
> mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > The increase in size is due to R as well as PolyBoRi. We will
> > work on decreasing the size of both packages. Burcin: can you
> > please post a bundle that applies against alpha4? I would like
> > to merge it during the alpha5 cycle.
>
Hi burcin,
> The new bundle, and a link to the new package is available at:
>
> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/469#comment:11
The bundle applies cleanly and I also updated to the latest
polybori.spkg you linked. But when doctesting devel/sage/sage/rings/
polynomial/pbori.pyx it bombs out with
File "pbori.pyx", line 377:
sage: P.<x,y,z> = BooleanPolynomialRing(3)
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/Work-mabshoff/release-cycles-2.9/sage-2.9.alpha4/
local/lib/python2.5/doctest.py", line 1212, in __run
compileflags, 1) in test.globs
File "<doctest __main__.example_11[0]>", line 1, in <module>
P = BooleanPolynomialRing(Integer(3),names=('x', 'y', 'z'));
(x, y, z,) = P._first_ngens(Integer(3))###line 377:
sage: P.<x,y,z> = BooleanPolynomialRing(3)
NameError: name 'BooleanPolynomialRing' is not defined
Consequently many of the following doctests fail since P isn't
defined. Any idea what to do? Mismerge? Bit and pieces missing from
the bundle? If you send me an update please make it a patch relative
to the tip of the bundle linked above.
> Cheers,
> Burcin
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
