On Aug 20, 10:56 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/20/07, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
And something completely different: There are people out there with
little or no coding experience. But those people can help during Bug
Days too by improving the Wiki or by trawling sage-support for "how do
I" question (and answers) and add them somewhere to the
documentation.
>
>
> > > I would like to encourage everybody to post their top wishlist item; we'll
> > > see what's popular (and realistic), and make those the milestones for
> > > sage-3.0.
>
> > I'd like to see PolyBoRi integrated by then. That would be a real killer
> > feature (for people like me). Also I want to have contributed my
> > MPolynomialSystem generators for several crypto systems (*) by then,
> > whenever 'then' is.
>
> I view "then" as being about Jan 1, 2008. It would be great to have SAGE-3.0
> available when I'm at the AMS meeting in San Diego. So "3 months" is
> the sort of time frame I have in mind. Is that reasonable for PolyBoRi?
>
> William
This entails getting it to build on Solaris. I am sure it runs on OSX
because that Michael Brickenstein has a Mac Laptop. So Michael, does
the code compile on Solaris? It seems likely because as a future part
of Singular I am sure that your boss would like to see that it does.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
