> > Hi, Hello,
> > > I propose that the next SAGE bug squash even be Saturday, September 1, > > which is > > in two weeks. Whose interested? > > Looks like I'll miss that one too, as I'll be out of town for labor > day weekend. > > > Those are just some ideas for what would make SAGE "3.0" material. > > Let me know what you think. > > High on my wishlist is being able to run SAGE on solaris 10 > (opensolaris). With all the work that has been done on porting SAGE on > solaris 9, this should be easier... in theory. > I just ordered my new Opteron workstation and it will run Solaris 10 some of the time, so I will try to get it to work, too. Martin Albrecht is also interested in getting Sage to work on Solaris/ Opteron. William and I are in IRC so feel free to drop by or visit us on neron. We got a working clisp (hopefully), but are currently stuck with Maxima. Maybe it is time to build another lisp. To quote William: [22:37] <was_> I talked to a guy who was heavily involved in lisp, solaris, and sysadmining. [22:37] <mabshoff> What did he say? [22:37] <was_> He showed me his build log files -- clisp stopped working on solaris for [22:37] <was_> him in 1997! We found a clisp binary from 2002 on neron, so let's see. The overall situation: Most major packets build, I believe sympow and cvxopt are the remaining holdouts. cvxopt complains about a missing complex.h. I know that there cvxopt binaries for Solaris - so any ideas? sympow might be slightly harder to crack due to the whole Sparc thing. > didier Cheers, Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
