On 8/20/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am. Date is fine, Saturday is also a good day because it lets one
> recover on Sunday.
>
> How does this relate to the 2.8.3 release date? I have started
I plan to release sage-2.8.3 on Friday, and for it to include new features.
Maybe 2.9 should be the release in two weeks with all the bug fixes
you have in mind?
By the way, 3.0 doesn't have to come after 2.9. We could have
2.9
2.10
2.11
2.12
...
then finally 3.0, which would be defined by some serious goals being
accomplished, e.g.,:
* Inclusion and use of FLINT 1.0 for Z[x] and Q[x] arithmetic
* Notebook 2.0 -- finish implementing all planned features (e.g.,
emptying the trash,
pdf output, etc.)
* MS Windows -- create a vmware or virtual pc image that is really usable
* deb, rpm -- automate creating these on several architectures
* .app -- native .app for OS X.
Those are just some ideas for what would make SAGE "3.0" material.
Let me know what you think.
> triaging potentially interesting bugs to be fixed for the 2.8.3
> milestone. While I haven't gotten as far as I would like yet I would
> really like somebody with detailed knowledge of the notebook to go
> through the open notebook bugs and decide which have been fixed and
> which are still relevant. At Bug Day 1 the notebook got very little
> love & tender care, but there are plenty of tickets that are notebook
> related.
>
> While we are milestones: Do you have any thoughts on 3.0 regrading
> features and timing? I think it would also be great if the patches
> that went to referees would also go into trac as a ticket, that way
> interested parties know what is coming up.
>
> >
> > It might be fun for the Seattle-area people to all meet up in a common
> > location for this.
>
> Love to join you, but my commute is a bitch :)
>
> I am about to finish the summary of Bug Day 1 and I have put a
> preliminary version at http://www.sagemath.org:9001/bug1/Results - the
> biggest lesson I have learned from Bug Day 1 is to report the results
> in real time because if you have to go through a log with a couple
> thousand lines after the fact it is a little more work than hoped for.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> >
> > --
> > William Stein
> > Associate Professor of Mathematics
> > University of Washingtonhttp://www.williamstein.org
>
>
> >
>
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://www.williamstein.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
