Yes am now beginning to realize the configs are much more important than I originally thought!
Thanks again!!! On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:28 PM, DeadZen <dead...@deadzen.com> wrote: > np, number of nodes and ring size play a lot into that. > as does your r,w settings. > might be fun to create a visualization one day ;) > > On Friday, May 27, 2016, Vikram Lalit <vikramla...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ok got it thanks. >> On May 27, 2016 4:02 PM, "DeadZen" <dead...@deadzen.com> wrote: >> >>> reiterating my last email >>> >>> > theres no guarantee vnodes are assigned to unique servers.. >>> >>> referencing the docs >>> >>> > Nodes *attempt* to claim their partitions at intervals around the >>> ring such that there is an even distribution amongst the member nodes and >>> that no node is responsible for more than one replica of a key. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Friday, May 27, 2016, Vikram Lalit <vikramla...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I have a Riak cluster (of 3 nodes, with 64 partitions and n_val = 3) >>>> but I find that for some objects, their hosting partitions / vnodes are not >>>> spread out across the 3 nodes. In some cases, 2 of them are on 1 node and >>>> the third is on a second node. That runs contrary to my understanding (link >>>> here: http://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.1.4/learn/concepts/clusters/) >>>> that the data is spread out across partitions in such a way that the >>>> partitions are on different servers. Is there something I'm missing here >>>> please in terms of how Riak works? Thanks... >>>> >>>>
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
