Ok got it thanks. On May 27, 2016 4:02 PM, "DeadZen" <dead...@deadzen.com> wrote:
> reiterating my last email > > > theres no guarantee vnodes are assigned to unique servers.. > > referencing the docs > > > Nodes *attempt* to claim their partitions at intervals around the ring > such that there is an even distribution amongst the member nodes and that > no node is responsible for more than one replica of a key. > > > > On Friday, May 27, 2016, Vikram Lalit <vikramla...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have a Riak cluster (of 3 nodes, with 64 partitions and n_val = 3) but >> I find that for some objects, their hosting partitions / vnodes are not >> spread out across the 3 nodes. In some cases, 2 of them are on 1 node and >> the third is on a second node. That runs contrary to my understanding (link >> here: http://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.1.4/learn/concepts/clusters/) that >> the data is spread out across partitions in such a way that the partitions >> are on different servers. Is there something I'm missing here please in >> terms of how Riak works? Thanks... >> >>
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
