np, number of nodes and ring size play a lot into that. as does your r,w settings. might be fun to create a visualization one day ;)
On Friday, May 27, 2016, Vikram Lalit <vikramla...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok got it thanks. > On May 27, 2016 4:02 PM, "DeadZen" <dead...@deadzen.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dead...@deadzen.com');>> wrote: > >> reiterating my last email >> >> > theres no guarantee vnodes are assigned to unique servers.. >> >> referencing the docs >> >> > Nodes *attempt* to claim their partitions at intervals around the ring >> such that there is an even distribution amongst the member nodes and that >> no node is responsible for more than one replica of a key. >> >> >> >> On Friday, May 27, 2016, Vikram Lalit <vikramla...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','vikramla...@gmail.com');>> wrote: >> >>> I have a Riak cluster (of 3 nodes, with 64 partitions and n_val = 3) but >>> I find that for some objects, their hosting partitions / vnodes are not >>> spread out across the 3 nodes. In some cases, 2 of them are on 1 node and >>> the third is on a second node. That runs contrary to my understanding (link >>> here: http://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.1.4/learn/concepts/clusters/) >>> that the data is spread out across partitions in such a way that the >>> partitions are on different servers. Is there something I'm missing here >>> please in terms of how Riak works? Thanks... >>> >>>
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
