> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Newton (andy) <a...@hxr.us> > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2024 4:17 PM > To: REGEXT Working Group <regext@ietf.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai (was: WGLC: > draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-09) > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > I support this document but have the following issues: > > 1. Section 2 discusses the migration to a newer version of the extension with > a > SHOULD but the text does not describe the migration process nor references > one. Either the SHOULD should be lowercased, the migration process should > be specified, or the migration process should be referenced.
[SAH] Thanks for the feedback, Andy. There's another option: remove this section entirely. My preference would be to either lowercase the SHOULD or to remove the section. Do you prefer one of those over the other? > 2. The last paragraph of the security section does not specify the "who" in > the > warning. Is this for registrars, registries, end users? [SAH] Are you referring to the "either address may be forwarded to the other" text? If so, it applies to all of those involved parties equally. I can make that clear by saying "all users of these addresses should be aware". Does that work? Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
