Speaking as a working group participant:
Sorry to be late to this specific discussion but I agree with Arnt and
don’t believe any changes are necessary to the existing document.
At least among gTLDs, the contact objects are typically not transferred.
Combine that with the fact that a registrant has gone to the new
registrar and entered contact information directly. Thus, if the
gaining registrar does not support EAI then the registrant has not
entered that information and there is no conflict. In addition, this
would apply to all information in the contact object so the additional
email address is not special in this regard.
Since the base EPP does not make this point I don’t feel that we
should make this point in this document. It might be an interesting
comment to add to an update to EPP since it does apply generally,
although I’m not convinced of that either; I’m suggesting we talk
about it then.
Jim
On 21 Nov 2024, at 15:54, Joseph Yee wrote:
inline
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 7:29 AM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck=
40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <a...@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 11:15 AM
To: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai
(was:
WGLC:
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search-09)
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
click links
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
content
is
safe.
Hollenbeck, Scott writes:
Please note that I have a comment from Joseph Yee that needs to be
addressed if there's no objection to do so.
Why does it need to be addressed?
EPP doesn't even try to tell you that a contact object will be
invalidated if the
domain is transferred, or that a contact object is referenced by
extension
objects that you can't see because you haven't declared support for
that
extension. What makes this case worth addressing?
[SAH] Give that reasoning, probably nothing. Maybe Joseph can add
more.
It's a nice-to-have reminder, and as discussed, it's a MAY for
registry to
consider.. After all, this one contains an email address.
-Joseph
Scott
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
