I support this document but have the following issues: 1. Section 2 discusses the migration to a newer version of the extension with a SHOULD but the text does not describe the migration process nor references one. Either the SHOULD should be lowercased, the migration process should be specified, or the migration process should be referenced.
2. The last paragraph of the security section does not specify the "who" in the warning. Is this for registrars, registries, end users? Thanks for the hard work on this, Scott. -andy On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 9:17 AM James Galvin <gal...@elistx.com> wrote: > > My apologies folks, I got the subject line wrong. > > The document in WGLC is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai/22/ > > > Please also take this message as a reminder to indicate your support or any > question or concerns you might have. > > I have changed the subject line on this message. > > > Thanks, > > Antoin and Jim > > > On 11 Nov 2024, at 6:56, kowa...@denic.de wrote: > > > Hi Jim and Antoin, > > > > It's a bit confusing, as the mail subject relates to > > draft-ietf-regext-rdap-rir-search and the content to > > draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai. > > > > May you please clarify which document is starting WGLC now? > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Pawel > > > > On 11.11.24 09:13, James Galvin wrote: > >> The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready > >> for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Proposed > >> Standard and thus this message begins a working group last call (WGLC): > >> > >> Use of Internationalized Email Addresses in the Extensible Provisioning > >> Protocol (EPP) > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai/22/ > >> > >> This document has been through WGLC previously and was submitted to the > >> IESG at that time. It was reverted back to the working group to resolve > >> comments received during the IETF Last Call and IESG review processes. > >> These comments have been addressed. Because the changes made in response > >> to the comments are considered to be technically material, the additional > >> WGLC is required. > >> > >> Please indicate your support or no objection for the publication of this > >> document by replying to this message on list (a reply of “+1” is > >> sufficient). > >> > >> If any working group member has questions regarding the publication of > >> this document please respond on the list with your concerns by close of > >> business everywhere, Monday, 25 November 2024. > >> > >> If there are no objections the document will be submitted to the IESG. > >> > >> The Document Shepherd for this document is Jody Kolker. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Antoin and Jim > >> REGEXT WG Co-Chairs > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org > >> To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
