On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 10:25 AM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com> wrote: > > > 1. Section 2 discusses the migration to a newer version of the extension > > with a > > SHOULD but the text does not describe the migration process nor references > > one. Either the SHOULD should be lowercased, the migration process should > > be specified, or the migration process should be referenced. > > [SAH] Thanks for the feedback, Andy. There's another option: remove this > section entirely. My preference would be to either lowercase the SHOULD or to > remove the section. Do you prefer one of those over the other?
IMHO, leaving the section in the draft will attract unwanted attention. :) > > > 2. The last paragraph of the security section does not specify the "who" in > > the > > warning. Is this for registrars, registries, end users? > > [SAH] Are you referring to the "either address may be forwarded to the other" > text? If so, it applies to all of those involved parties equally. I can make > that clear by saying "all users of these addresses should be aware". Does > that work? > It is better, but I don't have a "gooder" suggestion. That said, how is this a security consideration? It is a usability issue, but what is the security threat? -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
