-----Original Message-----
From: Francisco Obispo <fobi...@tucows.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 12:32 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com>
Cc: regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] EPP Transport Service Discovery
Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links
or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
This is a neat idea,
Is there a reasoning or use case for such need?
[SAH] [snip]
During today's WG meeting we discussed three proposals for non-TCP EPP
transport. If any of them become standards and are implemented and deployed, a
client will not be able to assume that tcp/700 is the only available transport.
It will need to discover which transport is supported by every server it
communicates with. That's the need.
Scott
_______________________________________________
Is there a need for in band discovery? Out of band via person to person comms
works fine for all kinds of one-off on-boarding activities.
If we propose that transport might change during regular operations, then I can
see a need for something in band.
Regardless of service discovery capability, I think EPP over alternate
transports should move forward.
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
