On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 09:00:06PM +0800, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote a message of 19 lines which said:
> we could imagine a registry accepting registrations implemented as a > DNAME record, not NS records. > > Would it make sense to create an extension (may be an addition to RFC > 5731) to allow these "DNAME registrations"? > > I'll be at the meeting tomorrow, if you prefer to discuss it AFK. After the discussion in Singapore, here is the draft. Comments and criticisms are welcome. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bortzmeyer-regext-epp-dname/ _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
