TWNIC might be using it, not absolutely sure if they continue to: https://www.icann.org/resources/idn-cctlds/1145486-2012-02-25-en
http://www.twnic.net/english/dn/dn_07a.htm http://www.twnic.net/english/dn/pdf7a.pdf Edmon > -----Original Message----- > From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kim Davies > Sent: Monday, 13 November 2017 10:49 AM > To: Francisco Arias <francisco.ar...@icann.org>; 'Stephane Bortzmeyer' > <bortzme...@nic.fr>; regext@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: EPP and DNAME records? > > The only TLD registry I am aware of that uses DNAME records is .gr, and in that > instance, I believe they synthesize them from an LGR in a deterministic way and > do not need to be provisioned by the customer. > > kim > > "regext on behalf of Francisco Arias" <regext-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of > francisco.ar...@icann.org> wrote: > > I cannot speak for .cat, but looking at zone file archives for their TLD, I haven't > seen DNAMES for a while. I believe they stopped using DNAMEs at some point in > the past. > > -- > Francisco > > On 11/13/17, 12:20 AM, "regext on behalf of Edmon Chung" <regext- > boun...@ietf.org on behalf of m...@edmon.asia> wrote: > > We actually do not use DNAME for IDN Variants at DotAsia. IDN Variants are > delegated to the same set of NS as the primary IDN for .Asia. Nevertheless, > its prob good to revisit having a standard IDN Variant provisioning > extension (again) now with the progress in the LGR work... > > Edmon > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephane > Bortzmeyer > > Sent: Sunday, 12 November 2017 21:00 PM > > To: regext@ietf.org > > Subject: [regext] EPP and DNAME records? > > > > [This comes from a discussion in DNSOP about a possible future .internal.] > > > > Some TLD include DNAMEs (for instance .cat and .asia) but apparently > only > as > > parts of an IDN bundle. Nevertheless, we could imagine a registry > accepting > > registrations implemented as a DNAME record, not NS records. > > > > There is apparently no way to do it in EPP. > > > > Would it make sense to create an extension (may be an addition to RFC > > 5731) to allow these "DNAME registrations"? > > > > I'll be at the meeting tomorrow, if you prefer to discuss it AFK. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > regext mailing list > > regext@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
