In article <20180106163022.ffo4wqah2i7l3...@sources.org> you write: >DNAME, like NS, is special. It cannot coexist with other records, for >instance.
It can coexist with anything other than CNAME, NS/DS, or another DNAME, and you need A, AAAA, and MX records at the DNAME to do what many people wrongly believe that DNAME does. See RFC 6672, sec 2.4. Not to be oversnarky, but I'd want a field to upload a picture of the user shooting himself in the foot to demonstrate that he understands what DNAMEs will do. I once did a spot check of the DNAMEs that used to be in .cat and I don't recall finding any that were implemented correctly, e.g., with a web server that responded to both www.<name> and www.<dname> with a reasonable web page. I assume I missed a discussion of what problem this solves -- is it in the list archives? R's, John _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
