I cannot speak for .cat, but looking at zone file archives for their TLD, I
haven't seen DNAMES for a while. I believe they stopped using DNAMEs at some
point in the past.
--
Francisco
On 11/13/17, 12:20 AM, "regext on behalf of Edmon Chung"
<regext-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of m...@edmon.asia> wrote:
We actually do not use DNAME for IDN Variants at DotAsia. IDN Variants are
delegated to the same set of NS as the primary IDN for .Asia. Nevertheless,
its prob good to revisit having a standard IDN Variant provisioning
extension (again) now with the progress in the LGR work...
Edmon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephane
Bortzmeyer
> Sent: Sunday, 12 November 2017 21:00 PM
> To: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [regext] EPP and DNAME records?
>
> [This comes from a discussion in DNSOP about a possible future .internal.]
>
> Some TLD include DNAMEs (for instance .cat and .asia) but apparently only
as
> parts of an IDN bundle. Nevertheless, we could imagine a registry
accepting
> registrations implemented as a DNAME record, not NS records.
>
> There is apparently no way to do it in EPP.
>
> Would it make sense to create an extension (may be an addition to RFC
> 5731) to allow these "DNAME registrations"?
>
> I'll be at the meeting tomorrow, if you prefer to discuss it AFK.
>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
